Using smppbox id

Alexander Malysh amalysh at kannel.org
Wed Oct 26 01:06:50 CEST 2011


Hi,

seems reasonable for me. Why we need the patch from Aarno then?

Alex

Am 21.10.2011 um 22:41 schrieb Rene Kluwen:

> Yes, opensmppbox opens a separate box connection per connected client.
> 
> I've heard before that using system-id is indeed more useful. So if you
> want, go for that by using use-systemid-as-smsboxid or simply set the
> system-type equal to system-id in clients.txt.
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Alexander Malysh [mailto:malysh00 at googlemail.com] On Behalf Of
> Alexander Malysh
> Sent: Thursday, 20 October, 2011 10:05
> To: Rene Kluwen
> Cc: 'Aarno Syvänen'; devel at kannel.org
> Subject: Re: Using smppbox id
> 
> But the box-id is for the whole box connection or does smppbox open extra
> box connection to bearerbox for
> each ESME?
> 
> Alex
> 
> 
> Am 19.10.2011 um 23:22 schrieb Rene Kluwen:
> 
>> Because the return messsges should be routed to the original client that
> sent the first message to begin with...
>> 
>> 
>> ----- Oorspronkelijk bericht -----
>> Van: Alexander Malysh <amalysh at kannel.org>
>> Verzonden: woensdag 19 oktober 2011 21:28
>> Aan: Rene Kluwen <rene.kluwen at chimit.nl>
>> CC: 'Aarno Syvänen' <as at gni.ch>; devel at kannel.org
>> Onderwerp: Re: Using smppbox id
>> 
>> why box-id per client? I meant box-id per smppbox. Why do you want box-id
> per client?
>> 
>> Alex
>> 
>> Am 19.10.2011 um 21:17 schrieb Rene Kluwen:
>> 
>>> So you want a config option for boxc-id per client?
>>> This is the same as configuring a system-type, isn't it?
>>> 
>>> I agree, it's a hack. But better than cluttering the config files.
>>> 
>>> == Rene
>>> 
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: devel-bounces at kannel.org [mailto:devel-bounces at kannel.org] On
> Behalf
>>> Of Alexander Malysh
>>> Sent: Wednesday, 19 October, 2011 19:41
>>> To: Aarno Syvänen
>>> Cc: devel at kannel.org Devel
>>> Subject: Re: Using smppbox id
>>> 
>>> Hi,
>>> 
>>> just looked through the source code and I can only agree with Andreas:
>>> system-type has nothing todo with box-id.
>>> I don't know who uses it and why but it's totally wrong. I would just
> remake
>>> this part and make it straight forward 
>>> from design and understanding perspective: kill existing box-id hack and
>>> implement clean config options for box-id
>>> and use _only_ these.
>>> 
>>> @Aarno: you changed the code for data_sm only, how about submit_sm?
>>> 
>>> Alex
>>> 
>>> Am 19.10.2011 um 15:26 schrieb Aarno Syvänen:
>>> 
>>>> This relies on assumption that no two smppbox share a client. I cannot
>>> accept this.
>>>> Besides, I can have two smppboxes connected to my application
>>>> 
>>>> Aarno
>>>> 
>>>> On 19.10.2011, at 15:19, Rene Kluwen wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> Like I said before: In clients.txt, you can put system-type to the
>>>>> opensmppbox-id and you are all set.
>>>>> 
>>>>> == Rene
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>> From: devel-bounces at kannel.org [mailto:devel-bounces at kannel.org] On
>>> Behalf
>>>>> Of Aarno Syvänen
>>>>> Sent: Wednesday, 19 October, 2011 09:35
>>>>> To: devel at kannel.org Devel
>>>>> Subject: Re: Using smppbox id
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> In my case, there is an application between bearerbox and smppbox.
>>>>> Thus application must route to smppbox and not to its clients.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Aarno
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> On 18.10.201
>> 
>> 
>> [Het originele bericht is niet volledig opgenomen]
> 
> 
> 




More information about the devel mailing list