DLR counters on the status page
Alexander Malysh
amalysh at kannel.org
Wed Nov 11 12:33:26 CET 2009
Am 11.11.2009 um 12:09 schrieb Alejandro Guerrieri:
> Ok, so you'd like the patch to transparently handle the concept of "outgoing" dlrs?
yes that would be great... This is 5 minutes patch :)
>
> It would be useless on many drivers where Kannel's acting as a "client" only (SMPP for instance) but yes, on HTTP and derivatives would make sense.
>
> Regards,
> --
> Alejandro Guerrieri
> aguerrieri at kannel.org
>
>
>
> On 11/11/2009, at 11:42, Alexander Malysh wrote:
>
>>
>> Am 11.11.2009 um 11:38 schrieb Alejandro Guerrieri:
>>
>>> Alex,
>>>
>>> Outgoing DLR's? At least on SMPP, there's not such a thing: when you submit an MT with dlr-mask/dlr-url set, the submit_sm PDU has the delivery receipt flag set. When the message is accepted (the SMSC sends a submit_sm_resp), kannel creates a first incoming DLR and later on the SMSC sends one incoming (deliver_sm) DLR (or more, if intermediate DLR's are enabled) with the message status(es).
>>>
>>> What do you mean with "outgoing DLR's" ?
>>
>> at least for HTTP smsc we can implement DLR forwarding...
>>
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> --
>>> Alejandro Guerrieri
>>> aguerrieri at kannel.org
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 11/11/2009, at 9:36, Alexander Malysh wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi Alex,
>>>>
>>>> I think we have to expand this patch to handle incoming and outgoing DLRs.
>>>> Now we don't differentiate DLRs from SMS traffic and therefore this is not a issue.
>>>> But if we start to differentiate DLRs from SMS we need to split it to incoming/outgoing
>>>> the same as for SMS traffic.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Alexander Malysh
>>>>
>>>> Am 11.11.2009 um 08:13 schrieb Alejandro Guerrieri:
>>>>
>>>>> Any objections? Can I commit?
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards,
>>>>> --
>>>>> Alejandro Guerrieri
>>>>> aguerrieri at kannel.org
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 10/11/2009, at 15:46, Stipe Tolj wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Alejandro Guerrieri schrieb:
>>>>>>> This patch adds separate dlr counters on the status page. This is much
>>>>>>> clearer than now imho, where we have dlr's and mo's mixed on the same
>>>>>>> counter.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> For example:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> SMS: inbound (0.00,0.00,0.00) msg/sec, *dlr (0.23,0.12,0.12) msg/sec*,
>>>>>>> outbound (0.12,0.06,0.06) msg/sec
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> SMSC connections:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> *fake*[fake] FAKE:10000 (online 109s, rcvd 0, *dlr 14*, sent 7,
>>>>>>> failed 0, queued 0 msgs)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> http://www.blogalex.com/archives/222
>>>>>>
>>>>>> yep, I'm in... +0 from my side.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Stipe
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> -------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>> Kölner Landstrasse 419
>>>>>> 40589 Düsseldorf, NRW, Germany
>>>>>>
>>>>>> tolj.org system architecture Kannel Software Foundation (KSF)
>>>>>> http://www.tolj.org/ http://www.kannel.org/
>>>>>>
>>>>>> mailto:st_{at}_tolj.org mailto:stolj_{at}_kannel.org
>>>>>> -------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
More information about the devel
mailing list