DLR counters on the status page

Alexander Malysh amalysh at kannel.org
Wed Nov 11 12:33:26 CET 2009


Am 11.11.2009 um 12:09 schrieb Alejandro Guerrieri:

> Ok, so you'd like the patch to transparently handle the concept of "outgoing" dlrs?

yes that would be great... This is 5 minutes patch :)

> 
> It would be useless on many drivers where Kannel's acting as a "client" only (SMPP for instance) but yes, on HTTP and derivatives would make sense.
> 
> Regards,
> --
> Alejandro Guerrieri
> aguerrieri at kannel.org
> 
> 
> 
> On 11/11/2009, at 11:42, Alexander Malysh wrote:
> 
>> 
>> Am 11.11.2009 um 11:38 schrieb Alejandro Guerrieri:
>> 
>>> Alex,
>>> 
>>> Outgoing DLR's? At least on SMPP, there's not such a thing: when you submit an MT with dlr-mask/dlr-url set, the submit_sm PDU has the delivery receipt flag set. When the message is accepted (the SMSC sends a submit_sm_resp), kannel creates a first incoming DLR and later on the SMSC sends one incoming (deliver_sm) DLR (or more, if intermediate DLR's are enabled) with the message status(es).
>>> 
>>> What do you mean with "outgoing DLR's" ?
>> 
>> at least for HTTP smsc we can implement DLR forwarding...
>> 
>>> 
>>> Regards,
>>> --
>>> Alejandro Guerrieri
>>> aguerrieri at kannel.org
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On 11/11/2009, at 9:36, Alexander Malysh wrote:
>>> 
>>>> Hi Alex,
>>>> 
>>>> I think we have to expand this patch to handle incoming and outgoing DLRs.
>>>> Now we don't differentiate DLRs from SMS traffic and therefore this is not a issue.
>>>> But if we start to differentiate DLRs from SMS we need to split it to incoming/outgoing
>>>> the same as for SMS traffic.
>>>> 
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Alexander Malysh
>>>> 
>>>> Am 11.11.2009 um 08:13 schrieb Alejandro Guerrieri:
>>>> 
>>>>> Any objections? Can I commit?
>>>>> 
>>>>> Regards,
>>>>> --
>>>>> Alejandro Guerrieri
>>>>> aguerrieri at kannel.org
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> On 10/11/2009, at 15:46, Stipe Tolj wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>>> Alejandro Guerrieri schrieb:
>>>>>>> This patch adds separate dlr counters on the status page. This is much
>>>>>>> clearer than now imho, where we have dlr's and mo's mixed on the same
>>>>>>> counter.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> For example:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> ...
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> SMS: inbound (0.00,0.00,0.00) msg/sec, *dlr (0.23,0.12,0.12) msg/sec*,
>>>>>>> outbound (0.12,0.06,0.06) msg/sec
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> ...
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> SMSC connections:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> *fake*[fake]    FAKE:10000 (online 109s, rcvd 0, *dlr 14*, sent 7,
>>>>>>> failed 0, queued 0 msgs)
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> http://www.blogalex.com/archives/222
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> yep, I'm in... +0 from my side.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Stipe
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> -- 
>>>>>> -------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>> Kölner Landstrasse 419
>>>>>> 40589 Düsseldorf, NRW, Germany
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> tolj.org system architecture      Kannel Software Foundation (KSF)
>>>>>> http://www.tolj.org/              http://www.kannel.org/
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> mailto:st_{at}_tolj.org           mailto:stolj_{at}_kannel.org
>>>>>> -------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> 
>> 
> 




More information about the devel mailing list