amalysh at kannel.org
Mon Nov 9 11:21:39 CET 2009
AFAIK ton and npi always bundled together. Therefore I don't see
reason to define only one value...
Am 09.11.2009 um 10:54 schrieb Nikos Balkanas:
> I don't see a reason to keep these variables bundled. ton is more
> frequently changed. npi almost never does. They mean different
> things, and are independent of each other. Why not give user the
> choice to set whatever they need in configuration? Same holds for
> source-addr-ton & npi.
> I think it makes more sense to patch the source. In either case if
> you decide to go with the guide, I can submit that as well. One of
> the two has to be patche, though.
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Alexander Malysh
> To: Nikos Balkanas
> Cc: devel at kannel.org
> Sent: Monday, November 09, 2009 11:32 AM
> Subject: Re: Patch: smsc_smpp.c
> I don't see reason to apply this patch. User can just define ton and
> npi settings. Maybe userguide patch
> would be more helpful?
> Alexander Malysh
> Am 02.11.2009 um 12:31 schrieb Nikos Balkanas:
>> This is another one in my series of trivial patches. This part of
>> the configuration has caused a lot of confusion in manual
>> configuring dest-addr-ton over the years, with users prefixing
>> their numbers with '+' instead of using the configuration.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the devel